THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NAGASHIGE TAKAHASHI and HIROMICHI SHIBUYA
__________
Appeal No. 98-1030
Application 08/424,1151
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Nagashige Takahashi et al. appeal from the final
1Application for patent filed April 19, 1995. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/893,044, filed June 3, 1992, now abandoned.
Application 07/893,044 was the subject of an earlier appeal to
this Board (Appeal No. 95-0905). In the earlier appeal, the
panel deciding the instant appeal rendered a decision
sustaining the examiner's rejections (see Paper No. 13).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007