Ex parte BADASH et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 98-1293                                         Page 5           
          Application No. 08/418,833                                                  


          strips (18) that provides a means for detachably fastening a                
          design or other pictorial representation (24).  However, Baxter             
          does not teach that the jacket is first embellished with a                  
          design, which is completed or augmented by a portion that later             
          is attached, as in the appellant’s invention, as required by                
          claims 1 and 26.  In view of this deficiency in Baxter, it is               
          our view that the teachings of the reference do not establish a             
          prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject                  
          matter of claims 1 and 26, and we will not sustain the                      
          rejection.  It follows that we also will not sustain the                    
          rejection of claims 2-12 and 23-25, which depend from claim 1.              
               Independent claim 27 requires that there be a plurality of             
          patches and that the article of textile material have                       
               a marked area for indicating a plurality of locations                  
               for mounting said plurality of patches respectively                    
               and wherein said plurality of patches, when mounted                    
               on said article of textile material at said plurality                  
               of locations, together form at least a portion of an                   
               ornamental design.                                                     
          Baxter discloses only one patch, and therefore explicitly has               
          no such teaching.  Moreover, the examiner has not stated, nor               
          can we find, any rationale for concluding that this feature                 
          would have been obvious in view of the teachings of Baxter.                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007