Ex parte BADASH et al. - Page 7




                 Appeal No. 98-1293                                                                                       Page 7                        
                 Application No. 08/418,833                                                                                                             


                                                 The Rejection Based Upon Saetre                                                                        
                          Independent claim 14 is directed to a greeting card having                                                                    
                 a sticker removably attached to its face.  The sticker must be                                                                         
                 “formed with first and second different adhesives” so that it                                                                          
                 can be adhered to the card and then removed and adhered to                                                                             
                 another surface.  Like the appellant’s invention, Saetre                                                                               
                 discloses a greeting card having a design that is attached to                                                                          
                 the face of the card, and can be removed from the card and                                                                             
                 attached to another surface.  However, the Saetre design is on                                                                         
                 a thin sheet of static cling material so that it is                                                                                    
                 electrostatically adhered to the various surfaces (column 1).                                                                          
                 This is not an adhesive, in either the commonly used definition                                                                        
                 of the term  or in the manner in which it is used in the3                                                                                                                  
                 appellant’s specification.  The reference  fails to teach the                                                                          
                 use of even a single adhesive, much less the required “first                                                                           
                 and second different adhesives,” and therefore fails to                                                                                
                 establish a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the                                                                         
                 subject matter of this claim.  We will not sustain the                                                                                 



                          3See, for example, Merriam Webster’s Collegiate                                                                               
                 Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1996, page 14.                                                                                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007