Appeal No. 1998-1454 Page 12 Application No. 08/422,840 12). To anticipate the claims, the Seliger apparatus, as a whole, must be configured and constructed to permit these functions and relationships. Seliger's housing (31) is not engageable with an end of a crankable shaft of a winch as required by the claims, because the sleeve (24) and drive shaft (27) of the apparatus extend outwardly from one end thereof and the handle (12') is provided at the other end thereof. Further, the thrust member (34) and spring (28) act internally of the housing (31) to engage the sleeve (24) and are not capable of locking the housing onto the end of a crankable shaft of a winch as required by the claims. While the examiner did not rely on this portion of Seliger in rejecting the claims, we do note that Seliger discloses a cranking device comprising a crank (41) and a fitting (40) having a square-shaped socket for engaging the square-shaped pin extension (18) of the drive shaft (27). However, while the fitting socket may be capable of being engaged with an appropriately sized cylindrical shaft of a winch "in a loose fitting relationship such that the engagement member may bePage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007