THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LYNN FRANCHAK
____________
Appeal No. 98-1456
Application No. 08/294,9581
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1, 3, 6 and 8 through 11, as amended subsequent
to the final rejection. These claims constitute all of the
claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed August 24, 1994.
2While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment
after final rejection filed on September 8, 1997, we note that
this amendment has not been clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007