Appeal No. 98-1457 Page 4
Application No. 08/530,006
Claims 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Crandall in view of Scowen,
Schlechtendahl and Jacques.
In addition to the two grounds of rejection set forth
above, the examiner's answer set forth the following new
grounds of rejection.
Claims 1 through 4, 7 through 10 and 13 through 15 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Crandall in view of Hynds and Schlechtendahl.
Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Crandall in view of Hynds,
Schlechtendahl and Scowen.
Claims 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Crandall in view of Hynds,
Schlechtendahl and Jacques.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007