Appeal No. 1998-1562 Page 17 Application No. 08/611,416 reasonably be expected to draw therefrom. In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968). In this case, after considering the collective teachings of Eichenberger and Johannsson, it is our opinion that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the appellants' invention to have modified Eichenberger's transport truck 1 by replacing pivoting receiving device 6 with a flap operated by a piston and cylinder unit as taught by Johannsson, to supply rolls to the working position in Eichenberger's lap processing machine. In this instance, it is our view that simplified feeding of reserve rolls to the working position taught by Johannsson would have provided the necessary motivation for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Eichenberger's apparatus. Thus, the combined teachings of Eichenberger and Johannsson would have suggested connecting a piston and cylinder unit to cause the pivoting of Eichenberger's receiving device 6 and to locate the reserve position at aPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007