Appeal No. 98-1640
Application 08/535,850
application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a feed nozzle assembly.
A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 11, a copy of which appears in the
APPENDIX to the amended appeal brief (Paper No. 16).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
document specified below:
Nielsen 5,174,889 Dec. 29,
1992
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 1, 11 through 17, and 19 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Nielsen.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007