Appeal No. 1998-1778 Page 2 Application No. 08/521,358 DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1 to 9, 11 to 17 and 23-27. Claims 10 and 18-22 have been canceled. In the brief (p. 1), the appellants withdrew the appeal with regard to claims 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 14 to 17 and 24. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with respect to claims 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 14 to 17 and 24. Claims 6, 9, 12, 13, 23, 25, 26 and 27 remain on appeal. We REVERSE. BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to a vacuum sewer toilet system. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 9, which appear in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Steltz 3,474,469 Oct. 28, 1969Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007