Ex parte LINDROOS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1778                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/521,358                                                  


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to                  
          allow claims 1 to 9, 11 to 17 and 23-27.  Claims 10 and 18-22               
          have been canceled.  In the brief (p. 1), the appellants                    
          withdrew the appeal with regard to claims 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 14              
          to 17 and 24. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with                     
          respect to claims 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11, 14 to 17 and 24.  Claims                
          6, 9, 12, 13, 23, 25, 26 and 27 remain on appeal.                           


               We REVERSE.                                                            


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a vacuum sewer                    
          toilet system.  An understanding of the invention can be                    
          derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 9, which                   
          appear in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                            


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              

          Steltz                   3,474,469                     Oct. 28,             
          1969                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007