Appeal No. 1998-1778 Page 4
Application No. 08/521,358
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Terve in view of Olin, Kenway, Steltz and
Ishii.
Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Terve in view of Olin, Kenway, Stroby and
Badger.
Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Terve in view of Olin, Kenway, Stroby,
Badger and Raupuk.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Terve in view of Olin, Kenway and Oldfelt.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (mailed
December 12, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning in
support of the rejections, and to the appellants' brief (filed
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007