Appeal No. 98-1979
Application 08/505,465
Appellants’ invention pertains to an adjustable shelving
system. An understanding of the invention can be derived from
a reading of exemplary claim 17, a copy of which appears in
the Appendix to the brief (Paper No. 11).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Glaberson et al 3,221,893 Dec. 7,
1965
(Glaberson)
Doherty 3,918,670 Nov. 11,
1975
Stroh 3,993,002 Nov. 23,
1976
Zimmerman 4,858,773 Aug.
22, 1989
Brewster 5,039,046 Aug. 13,
1991
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 17, 18, and 21 through 23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stroh in view of
Zimmerman.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007