Appeal No. 98-1979
Application 08/505,465
unpatentable over Stroh in view of Zimmerman, further in view
of Doherty.
Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Stroh in view of Zimmerman, further in view
of Glaberson.
Claim 24 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Stroh in view of Zimmerman, further in view
of Brewster.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer
(Paper No. 12), while the complete statement of appellants’
argument can be found in the briefs (Paper No. 11).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issue
raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007