THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL STEWART
_____________
Appeal No. 98-2357
Application 08/772,3361
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, MEISTER and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Michael Stewart (the appellant) appeals from the final
1 Application for patent filed December 23, 1996.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/702,208, filed August 23, 1996, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 08/379,083, filed
August 15, 1995, now abandoned, which is a division of
Application 06/109,463, filed January 4, 1980, now U.S. Patent
No. D264,060, granted April 27, 1982.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007