Appeal No. 1998-2386
Application No. 08/757,749
The full text of the examiner's rejection and the
responses to the arguments presented by appellant appear in
the Answer mailed March 10, 1998 (Paper No. 14), while the
complete
statement of appellant’s arguments can be found in the Brief
filed February 17, 1998 (Paper No. 13).
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellant’s specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellant and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we conclude that
the
§ 103 rejection cannot be sustained.
Claim 1, the only independent claim, calls for an
association and location identification game comprising: at
least one sheet of material having a first portion of less
than an overall image visibly printed thereon and “a second
portion physically associated as a continuity with said first
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007