Appeal No. 1998-2386 Application No. 08/757,749 (CCPA 1974). Appellant argues (Brief, pages 3 and 4) that Engel and Kawashima, taken alone or in combination, neither teach nor suggest a sheet of material having a first portion of less than an overall image visibly printed thereon and a second portion physically associated as a continuity with the first portion of the overall image forming part thereof to assist in completion of the overall image invisibly printed on the sheet of material as a latent image and a compatible visible image third portion to be selected and movably associated with the developed second image portion. The examiner, on the other hand, maintains that Engel teaches a game book containing at least one sheet [18, Figure 2] having a character or first image “portion” [20] and a plurality of half tone images or second image “portions” [24, Figure 7] printed in areas [22] which “may be broadly interpreted as a continuity with the first portion” and a sticker or third image “portion” [12, Figures 3 and 4] which the examiner contends is “broadly physically associated” with the first image “portion” [20] (Answer, page 5). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007