THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NOZOMU SHIOTSU and RIE MATSUBARA
__________
Appeal No. 98-2805
Application 08/663,8491
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 12 and 14 through 16.
Claims 3 and 13, the only other claims remaining in the
application, have been objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base (parent) claim, but have been indicated to be
1 Application for patent filed June 14, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007