Appeal No. 98-2805 Application 08/663,849 To summarize, neither the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 through 12 and 14 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Hattori, or the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on Hattori has been sustained. The decision of the examiner is, accordingly, reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CEF/kis 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007