Ex parte WILKINS et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-2847                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/521,873                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellants' invention relates to an add-on board                                                                          
                 game.  A copy of the claims under appeal appears in the                                                                                
                 appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                                                     


                          The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                                                                          
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                                          
                 Wilson                                       4,585,233                                             Apr. 29,                            
                 1986                                                                                                                                   



                          Claims 1, 2, 12, 14 to 16, 27, 29, 38 and 40 to 42 stand                                                                      
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                                                                             
                 indefinite for failing to particularly point out and                                                                                   
                 distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants                                                                               
                 regard as the invention.                                                                                                               


                          Claims 1, 2, 12, 14 to 16, 27, 29, 38 and 40 to 42 stand                                                                      
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                                                                              
                 Wilson.2                                                                                                                               

                          2On page 6 of the brief (Paper No. 18, filed October 6,                                                                       
                                                                                                            (continued...)                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007