Ex parte SIEMERS - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-2849                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 08/584,158                                                  


          altered by these two paragraphs.  Thus, there is no basis for               
          a rejection of claims 35 through 74 based upon the written                  
          description requirement of 35 U.S.C.                                        
          § 112, first paragraph.                                                     


               For the reasons stated above, the decision of the                      
          examiner to reject claims 35 through 74 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          first paragraph, is reversed.                                               


          The non-statutory subject matter issue                                      
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 35 through 74              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 101.                                                      


               Section 101 of title 35, United States Code, provides:                 
               Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process,               
               machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any                 
               new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent                
               therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of                
               this title.                                                            

               The Supreme Court has held that Congress chose the                     
          expansive language of 35 U.S.C. § 101 so as to include                      









Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007