Ex parte INAMORI et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-3064                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/445,867                                                  


          for selecting one of the segment drive circuits and providing               
          address data for writing/reading data to/from said relative                 
          address and for providing/receiving display data only to/from               
          the selected segment drive circuit; and                                     
                    a processing unit connected to the common drive                   
               unit for providing said input data including display                   
               data and address data and for receiving output data                    
               read from the display unit.                                            


               The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:               
          Mano et al.                   4,985,698                Jan. 15,             
          1991                                                                        
          Koyama                        2,224,873                May  16,             
          1990.                                                                       
          (UK Patent Application)                                                     


               Claims 2 and 4-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)              
          as obvious over Koyama in view of Mano.  Rather than repeat                 
          the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer               
          the reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details              
          thereof.                                                                    


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered                 
          the  subject matter on appeal and the rejection and evidence                
          advanced by the examiner.  Furthermore, we duly considered the              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007