Ex parte STANTON et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 98-3292                                                           
          Application 08/611,848                                                       


          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Grant.                            


          Claims 6, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                          
          102(b) as being anticipated by Gutman.                                       


          Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
          unpatentable over Gutman in view of Massa and Joseph.                        




          Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
          unpatentable over Gutman in view of Tracy.                                   


          Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
          unpatentable over Gutman in view of Massa and Joseph as                      
          applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Grant.                      


          Claims 12, 14, 15 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Grant in view of Goldenberg.                


          Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      


                                           4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007