Appeal No. 98-3292
Application 08/611,848
unpatentable over Grant in view of Goldenberg as applied to
claims 12, 14, 15 and 17 above, and further in view of Roth.
Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full
commentary with regard to the above-noted rejections and the
conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants
regarding the rejections, we make reference to the final
rejection (Paper No. 6, mailed April 4, 1997) and the
examiner's
answer (Paper No. 13, mailed November 17, 1997) for the
reasoning
in support of the rejections, and to appellants’ brief (Paper
No. 12, filed October 14, 1997) for the arguments
thereagainst.
OPINION
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007