Ex parte STANTON et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 98-3292                                                           
          Application 08/611,848                                                       


          According to the specification (pages 2-4) the first plane                   
          (30) is defined by the upper surface of the underlying printed               
          circuit board seen in the lower right portion of Figure 1,                   
          while the second plane (28) is defined by                                    




          the light pipe (26) which carries electrical contacts and                    
          runners (31) or alternatively includes a flex circuit (32)                   
          with runners (33) that are coupled to the control printed                    
          circuit board via pad (34). Thus, it appears that the first                  
          and second planes referred to in appellants’ claims on appeal                
          form no part of the integrally formed contiguous keypad                      
          defined in the claims, but instead are merely different planes               
          within the overall device itself, which planes carry                         
          electrical contacts with which the keys of the keypad are                    
          operatively or functionally associated via the conductive                    
          material (19, 25, 35) provided on the bottom surfaces of the                 
          keys to thereby permit activation of a given circuit or                      
          circuit component.  Note particularly, page 4, lines 6-19 of                 
          appellants’ specification.  As a result of the ambiguity in                  


                                          10                                           





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007