Appeal No. 1998-3301 Page 5
Application No. 08/784,361
Claims 8, 9, 11, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22 and 23 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite
for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
subject matter which the appellant regards as the invention.
Claims 2, 4 through 7, 12, 14, 15 and 25 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Crowder.
Claims 2, 4 through 7, 12, 14, 15 and 25 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Wright.
Claims 2, 4 through 7, 12, 13, 14 and 25 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Harmony.
Claims 19, 26 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Wright.
Claims 19, 26 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Crowder.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007