Ex parte CHAPMAN - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-3301                                       Page 7           
          Application No. 08/784,361                                                  


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                 
          rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper                 
          No. 7, mailed December 15, 1997) and the examiner's answer                  
          (Paper No. 12, mailed July 1, 1998) for the examiner's                      
          complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the                 
          appellant's brief (Paper No. 11, filed May 11, 1998) and reply              
          brief (Paper No. 13, filed August 27, 1998) for the                         
          appellant's arguments thereagainst.                                         


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                 
          careful consideration to the appellant's specification and                  
          claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the                     
          respective positions articulated by the appellant and the                   
          examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                      
          determinations which follow.                                                


          The indefiniteness rejection                                                










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007