Appeal No. 1998-3301 Page 6
Application No. 08/784,361
Claims 19, 26 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Harmony.
Claims 27, 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over either Crowder, Wright or Harmony
each in view of Sohr.
Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over either Crowder, Wright or Harmony each
in view of Phipps.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over either Crowder, Wright or Harmony each in
view of Steinbronn.
Claims 17 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over either Crowder, Wright or Harmony each
in view of Phipps as applied above, and further in view of
Christensen.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007