THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DAVID W. SCHULZ
________________
Appeal No. 99-0158
Application 08/616,7871
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before COHEN, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
David W. Schulz appeals from the final rejection of
1Application for patent filed March 15, 1996 as a 37 CFR
§ 1.62 file wrapper continuation of Application 08/228,488,
filed April 15, 1994, now abandoned. Both the appellant and
the examiner may wish to look into discrepancies in the record
involving the March 15, 1996 filing date assigned to the
instant application. This filing date appears to be
subsequent to abandonment date of Application 08/228,488.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007