Ex parte SCHULZ - Page 2




          Appeal No. 99-0158                                                          
          Application 08/616,787                                                      


          claims 1, 5, 9 through 11 and 23.  Claims 2 and 3, the only                 
          other claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from               
          consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b).  We reverse.                   
               The invention relates to “superplastic forming of tubular              
          structures, and more particularly to end sealing of a tubular               
          blank of superplastic material in preparation for superplastic              
          forming to the final shape” (specification, page 1).  A copy                
          of the appealed claims appears in the appendix to the                       
          appellant’s main brief (Paper No. 25).                                      
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Macha                         2,861,530           Nov. 25, 1958             
          Fields, Jr. et al. (Fields)        3,340,101           Sept. 5,             
          1967 Greacen                       3,900,939           Aug. 26,             
          1975                                                                        
          Miller et al. (Miller)        5,022,135           Jun. 11, 1991             
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                  
          follows:                                                                    
               a) claims 1, 10 and 23 as being unpatentable over Fields               
          in view of Greacen;                                                         
               b) claim 5 as being unpatentable over Fields in view of                
          Greacen and Macha; and                                                      
               c) claims 9 and 11 as being unpatentable over Fields in                
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007