THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHEW A. HOWARD III, WILLIAM E. LA VELLE,
MATTHEW B. DOBBS and TEREASA M. SIMONSON
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0212
Application No. 08/230,5261
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1, 4, 7-13, 15-18 and 21-23. Claims 2 and 3
have been canceled, and claims 5, 6, 14, 19 and 20 have been
allowed.
1Application for patent filed April 20, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007