THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MAX FRIEDHEIM __________ Appeal No. 1999-0406 Application 08/484,0191 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Max Friedheim appeals from the final rejection of claims 1 through 42, all of the claims pending in the application. We affirm-in-part and enter a new ground of rejection. The invention relates to a “generator for rapid 1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007