Ex parte FRIEDHEIM - Page 6




                     Appeal No. 1999-0406                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/484,019                                                                                                                                            


                     inter alia, a vaporization member having a portion defining a                                                                                                     
                     plurality of holes having substantially circular cross-                                                                                                           
                     section.  Independent claim 29 recites a method for                                                                                                               
                     fabricating a vapor generator comprising, inter alia, the step                                                                                                    
                     of providing such a vaporizing member.  Independent claim 14                                                                                                      
                     recites a vapor generator comprising, inter alia, a chamber                                                                                                       
                     wall defining a plurality of holes having substantially                                                                                                           
                     regular cross-section.  The examiner’s determination that                                                                                                         
                     these limitations are met by the etched cavities disclosed by                                                                                                     
                     Friedheim ‘037 (see page 3 in the final rejection and pages 3                                                                                                     
                     and 4 in the answer) is not well founded.  The fair teaching                                                                                                      
                     of Friedheim ‘037 as it would be viewed by a person of                                                                                                            
                     ordinary skill in the art is that the etched cavities have                                                                                                        
                     random shapes as shown in Figures 3 through 5, not shapes                                                                                                         
                     which are substantially circular or regular in cross-section                                                                                                      
                     as recited in claims 1, 14 and 29.   The mere possibility that           3                                                                                        
                     some of these randomly shaped cavities might inherently have                                                                                                      
                     circular or regular cross-sections is not sufficient to meet                                                                                                      


                                3 Figure 4 in the Friedheim ‘037 reference does not                                                                                                    
                     clearly show cavities having a circular cross-section as                                                                                                          
                     asserted by the examiner on page 4 in the answer.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                          6                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007