Ex parte LANNERT et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0525                                                         
          Application 08/590,859                                                       





               Appellants’ invention pertains to a sealing arrangement.                
          An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                      
          reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the                 
          APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 20).                                   


               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the                
          documents listed below:                                                      


          Alff                     4,948,277                      Aug.                 
          14, 1990                                                                     
          Ishiguro            5,133,609                      Jul. 28,                  
          1992                                                                         
          Hixson, II          5,476,272                      Dec. 19,                  
          1995                                                                         


               The following rejections are before us for review.                      


               Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Alff in view of Hixson, II.                 


               Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  

                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007