Appeal No. 1999-0525 Application 08/590,859 Appellants’ invention pertains to a sealing arrangement. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 20). As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the documents listed below: Alff 4,948,277 Aug. 14, 1990 Ishiguro 5,133,609 Jul. 28, 1992 Hixson, II 5,476,272 Dec. 19, 1995 The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Alff in view of Hixson, II. Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007