Appeal No. 1999-0635 14
Application No. 08/688,825
Therefore, we shall not sustain the examiner's rejection
of claims 5, 7-15 and 17-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Warfel in view of Hutchinson.
We have reviewed the teachings of Pyle, but we find
nothing therein which alters our view with regard to the
combination of Warfel and Hutchinson. Thus, it follows that
we shall also not sustain the examiner's 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of claims 2 and 16 as being unpatentable over Warfel
in view of Hutchinson and Pyle.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007