Appeal No. 1999-0635 8 Application No. 08/688,825 (movably or swingably) to a door frame, we think, requires no discussion. Turning now to the examiner's rejection of claims 5, 7-15 and 17-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Christison in view of Hutchinson, we note that Christison discloses a burglar proof door guard comprising an extensible gate including vertical members (16-18) and toggles or links (19) pivoted to the vertical members as indicated at (20). The outer vertical member (14) is secured by a pair of hinges (23, 24) and screws (26) to a flat strip (27). The inner vertical member (16) is slidably supported by U bolts (29) fitting about a plurality of horizontal rods (28) mounted to a wall (30). The gate is attached to the door using a pair of links (38, 39) adapted to fit about the door knob handle (13) and a locking ring (46) for locking the links about the knob handle. The examiner states on pages 3 and 4 of the answer that Christison does not disclose the extensible doorway barrier as comprising an open mesh attached to and stored on a reel, as required by the claims. We further note that Christison lacks "flexible material means for spanning a lower portion of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007