THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MERRIE BRITT
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0635
Application No. 08/688,8251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 5 and 7 through 20, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.2
Application for patent filed July 31, 1996. According to the1
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/354,718,
filed December 6, 1994, now abandoned.
The examiner's comment on page 2 of the answer that the amendment2
after final rejection filed July 15, 1996 in parent Application No. 08/354,718
has not been entered appears to be in error. The file record indicates that
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007