Appeal No. 1999-1523 Page 8 Application No. 08/839,065 1), we nevertheless find that as set forth above that Rensch's framework is inherently capable of transferring a lateral load from a beam to at least one of the load bearing members (i.e., girders 3E, 3F and 3I). For the reasons stated above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed. Claims 2, 3 and 6 to 8 The appellant has grouped claims 1 to 3 and 6 to 8 as standing or falling together. Thereby, in accordance with4 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claims 2, 3 and 6 to 8 fall with claim 1. Thus, it follows that the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2, 3 and 6 to 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is also affirmed. Claims 4 and 5 We will not sustain the rejection of claims 4 and 5 under 4See page 4 of the appellant's brief.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007