Appeal No. 1999-1747 Page 4
Application No. 08/715,422
Claims 1, 2 and 7 to 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Eschbaugh in view of Joseph and
Spors.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Eschbaugh in view of Joseph and Spors as
applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Tarum.
Claims 4 to 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as3
being unpatentable over Eschbaugh in view of Joseph, Spors and
Tarum as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Rea.
Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Eschbaugh in view of Joseph and Spors as
applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Dick.
Claims 1 and 11 to 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Legris in view of Joseph and
Guest.
3Id.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007