Appeal No. 1999-1987 Page 7 Application No. 08/400,129 Alexander discloses a heavier ball 12'. As shown in Figure 5, the heavier ball 12' is attached to the line 14 via two lengths 76, 78 of an elastic cord formed of elastic strands with a covering of cloth fabric braided suitably to permit expansion and contraction of the cord. Albert discloses a baseball practice device. As shown in Figure 2, the baseball practice device includes a baseball 25, a length of linked chain 23, a rubber bumper 21 and a length of rubber tubing or hose 30 which extends over the lower portion of the chain 23 and engages at one end with the baseball 25. Albert teaches (column 1, lines 43-46, and column 2, lines 26-28) that the length of rubber tubing or hose 30 provides protection for the bat and eliminates whips in the chain which would otherwise occur when the ball is struck. After the scope and content of the prior art are determined, the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained. Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007