Paper No. 22
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TSUTOMU HARUNA
and SADAO KITA
______________
Appeal No. 1999-2020
Application D-29/058,0311
_______________
HEARD: DECEMBER 6, 1999
_______________
Before THOMAS, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of the following design claim:
The ornamental design for a pre-recorded optical
1 Application for patent filed August 6, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007