Appeal No. 1999-2020 Application D-29/058,031 What is apparent here is that the underlying substrate material in Cohn was transparent, the only variation being the manner or extent in which the stripe of any color was displayed on this transparent portion. Stated differently, the patent-ability of the design in effect resided upon the extent to which the underlying substrate “color” was revealed. A similar observation is present in the instant claim on appeal where a conventional transparent substrate material for a pre-recorded optical disk was admitted by appellants to be known in the art as well as recognized and taught in Benne. Generally speaking, the same radial extent of the colored and transparent regions of the claimed invention are present in Figures 1 and 2 of Benne as well. Thus, the underlying nature of the disk substrate being transparent is presented in a specific location and to specific or general radial extent as compared with the known prior art disk represented by Benne. Indeed, Benne confirms that prior art disk substrates are transparent and have a reflective coating to any radial extent thereon generally visible on one side and/or a colored or 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007