THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CURT ENGLANDER ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2094 Application No. 08/517,1981 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before NASE, CRAWFORD, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 14 through 22, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed August 21, 1995. According to the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/117,690, filed September 8, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007