THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE GAQUERE ____________ Appeal No. 99-2104 Application No. 08/759,9831 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed December 3, 1996. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/332,461, filed October 31, 1994, now U.S. Patent No. 5,581,867 issued December 10, 1996; which is a continuation of Application No. 07/920,441, filed October 13, 1992, now abandoned; which is the national stage Application of PCT/FR91/01025, filed December 17, 1991.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007