THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD S. MUKA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2220
Application No. 08/662,9301
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN,
and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-7, 29-36, 51-55, 58-66, 69-71 and
79. Claims 8-28, 37-50 and 78 have been canceled, and claims
56, 57, 67, 68 and 72-77 have been withdrawn as being drawn to
a non-elected invention.
1Application for patent filed June 13, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007