Appeal No. 1999-2243 Application 08/567,081 unpatentable over Losi, or Whorton in view of Boldt, in view of other prior art. Conclusion The examiner's decision to reject the claims on appeal is affirmed as to claims 12 and 13, and reversed as to claims 14 to 28, 30 to 36 and 38. Claims 16 to 21, 23 to 28, 31, 32, 34 to 36 and 38 are rejected pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), and the application is remanded to the examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(e). In addition to affirming the examiner’s rejection of one or more claims, this decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) and a remand pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(e). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that “[a] new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.” 37 CFR § 1.196(e) provides that [w]henever a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences includes or allows a remand, that decision shall not be considered a final decision. When appropriate, upon conclusion of proceedings on remand before the examiner, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences may enter 18Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007