Appeal No. 1999-2243 Application 08/567,081 the claimed cart with a cash receptacle, as discussed above in connection with rejection (3). Rejections (5) and (6) These rejections will not be sustained because the additional references applied, Evans and Jones, do not supply the deficiencies noted in the preceding discussions of rejec- tions (3) and (4). Rejections Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the follow- ing new grounds of rejection: (I) Claims 16 to 19 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Losi, which discloses a cart having a box structure, a cash receptacle 69, and central wheels 10 projecting below casters 12, 14. The Losi cart is not a "casino change" cart, as recited in the preamble of claim 16, but this recita- tion does not constitute a claim limitation because it recites no structural limitations of the claimed invention, but rather, a structurally complete invention is defined in the body of the claim, and the preamble merely states the purpose 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007