Ex parte BALDWIN - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1999-2243                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/567,081                                                                                                                 



                                   A "logo" is "a graphic representation or symbol of a                                                                 
                 company name, trademark, abbreviation, etc., often uniquely                                                                            
                 designed for ready recognition."   The logo of a casino would4                                                                            
                 itself constitute a "selected casino theme," as recited in                                                                             
                 claim 1, because in normal usage the logo or symbol of the                                                                             
                 casino                                                                                                                                 




                 would be used throughout the casino, generally wherever the                                                                            
                 casino's name was displayed.  Therefore, placing the casino                                                                            
                 logo on the side panels of the Pike cart, as disclosed by                                                                              
                 Pike, would constitute the claimed "means adapting said cart                                                                           
                 to match a selected casino theme," and all the limitations of                                                                          
                 claim 1 would be met.                                                                                                                  
                                   In effect, our conclusion is that claim 1 is antici-                                                                 
                 pated by Pike, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).  Nevertheless,   we                                                                           
                 will sustain the rejection of claim 1 under § 103, since                                                                               




                          4The Random House Dictionary of the English Language (2nd                                                                     
                 Ed. 1987).                                                                                                                             
                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007