Ex parte KOCIVAR - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1999-2365                                                        
          Application 08/569,999                                                      



          engageable with the female portions 38.  As for claim 28,                   
          Thier discloses at col. 5, lines 22 to 26, that there may be                
          "more than one inner bag [16]"; such a plurality of inner bags              
          would constitute the pluralities of first and second flexible               
          coverings recited in this claim.                                            




                    With regard to the recitation of "[a]n emergency                  
          care blanket" or "[a] modular emergency care blanket system"                
          in the first line of these claims, this recitation in the                   
          preamble is  of no patentable significance because it offers                
          no distinct definition of any of the claimed invention's                    
          limitations, but merely states the purpose or intended use of               
          the invention.  Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182              
          F.3d 1298, 1305,  51 USPQ2d 1161, 1165-66 (Fed. Cir. 1999).                 
          Moreover, it appears that the Thier apparatus would                         
          "accommodate an individual in need of assistance" and "protect              
          the individual from heat loss and against prevailing                        
          environmental conditions," as recited in the preamble of                    
          claims 1, 28 and 31.                                                        

                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007