Ex parte KOCIVAR - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1999-2365                                                        
          Application 08/569,999                                                      



          (II) Whether the specification and/or drawings should be                    
          objected to, or claims rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, in view              
          of the following:                                                           
          (i) There is a discrepancy between Figs. 1 and 2.  In Fig. 2,               
          one edge of the blanket is shown as folded over, as it                      
          apparently would have to be in order for the male portion of                
          the snaps 70 along one edge to engage the female portion of                 
          the snaps 70 along the other edge; this puts one end (the                   
          right end in Fig. 2) of draw cord 32 inside the folded                      
          blanket.  However, in Fig. 1, of which Fig. 2 purports to be                
          an enlarged end view, neither of the engaged edges of the                   
          blanket is shown as folded over, and both ends of each of the               
          draw cords 32 extend beyond the edges of the blanket.  Also,                
          in Fig. 2 the unengaged parts of the fasteners 70 are not                   
          shown (unlike in Figs. 7 and 12).                                           
          (ii) On page 13, lines 13 to 15, the first flexible covering                
          20 is described as being an insulating layer 21 and a shell                 






                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007