Interference No. 101,981
The issues presented for our decision include the parties’ cases for priority, motions, and
statements of the issues taken from the parties’ briefs.
Motions
Qadri
under 37 C.F.R. § 1.656(h) to exclude from evidence Beyers et al. Exhibits Be 34, 35, and 36.
(filed May 22, 1992; paper no. 217(1))
under 37 C.F.R. § 1.656(h) “to exclude from evidence all testimony by Dr. Stuart S.P. Parkin and
Robert B. Beyers relating to magnetization tests of sample 4 and sample 5, and testimony
based on these tests, which has been offered into evidence by the Party Beyers et al.”
(filed May 22, 1992; paper no. 217(2))
under 37 C.F.R. § 1.656(h) “to exclude from evidence Exhibit BX13, which has been offered
into evidence by the Party Batlogg et al.” (filed May 22, 1992; paper no. 217(3))
under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.635 and 1.633(a) for judgment against Batlogg because of the failure to
disclose the best mode. (filed July 13, 1992; paper no. 241)
Beyers
under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.635 and 1.656(h) to suppress evidence by Qadri - Exhibits Q-1 through Q-
64 and Q-66 through Q-113. (filed May 26, 1992; paper no. 220(1))
under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.635 and 1.656(h) to suppress evidence by Batlogg - Exhibits Ba-1 through
Ba-18 on various grounds including hearsay, no foundation, incompetent or irrelevant.
(filed May 26, 1992; paper no. 220(2))
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007