Interference No. 101,981
Summary
The motions and statement of the issues are consolidated in
the following manner and will be discussed infra in this order:
COUNT INTERPRETATION
The meaning of the count (BaI1)
PRIORITY
Requirements for establishing conception of the count (BaI2;
QI1(a-b))
Requirements for establishing reduction to practice of the
count (BaI6; QI4)
Qadri’s case for priority
Issues regarding Qadri’s conception and diligence in
reducing the invention to practice (BaI4; QI2; QI3)
Beyers case for priority
Issues regarding Beyers’ conception (BaI5)
Batlogg’s case for priority
Issues regarding Batlogg’s actual reduction to practice
(BaI6)
PATENTABILITY
Whether Batlogg’s application complies with the written
description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (QI5)
Whether Batlogg’s application complies with the enablement
requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (BaI7; QI5)
BaM2
BaM3
Whether Batlogg’s application complies with the best mode
requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (BaI8-9; QI7)
BaM3
QM4
Whether Beyers’ application complies with 35 U.S.C. § 112
(QI6)
14
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007